By K. Morrell
This thought-provoking e-book will entice either experts and newbies to Aristotle. experts will welcome the eye to unique texts that underpin a lot of our rules on politics, company experiences, and different social sciences, while newbies will savor the lucid summaries and purposes that make Aristotle fascinatingly obtainable.
Read or Download Organization, Society and Politics: An Aristotelian Perspective PDF
Best business ethics books
The finishing touch of the human genome venture in 2000 dramatically emphasised the upcoming luck of the genetic revolution. the moral and social results of this medical improvement are titanic. From human replica to life-extending remedies, from the influence on gender and race to public future health and public security, there's scarcely part of our lives left unaffected through the impression of the hot genetics.
Embedding CSR into company tradition demonstrates new frontier for company social accountability is feasible in idea and perform. the main concept - discovery management - permits company managers to deal successfully with difficulties, concerns, and price clashes taking place on the corporation-society interface.
This ebook highlights the main severe features of range and their implications for company Social accountability (CSR), studying them in a suite of conceptual and functional contributions from researchers and practitioners alike. particularly the publication discusses sturdy and top practices for variety administration and analyzes attainable hyperlinks among CSR and variety inside organisations.
Additional resources for Organization, Society and Politics: An Aristotelian Perspective
The state is by nature clearly prior to the family and to the individual ... the individual when isolated, is not self-sufficing; and therefore he is like a part in relation to the whole. But he who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god; he is no part of a state. A social instinct is implanted in all men by nature. ((Politics, 1253a19–30) In passing, to show the fluency between the terms politics and society in Aristotle, Barker translates ‘live in society’ (above) as ‘share in the benefits of political association’.
Still at heart they prompt us to ask why should this (or any) commentary seek to defend Aristotle? Without even contesting whether these criticisms of Aristotle are fair, it is worth noting, to our collective shame, that it would require very little work to turn the most offensive aspects of Aristotle’s political philosophy into a description of the way our post-Enlightenment world is structured. Patriarchy, global capitalism, and the legacy of colonialism combine in such a way that our supposedly modern society realizes and entrenches principles of misogyny, slavery and racism.
Applying this to Aristotle, knowledge-relativism suggests that any claims that he made to understand society were local to his time and place, and are not portable. Though he is by no means a relativist, Lukacs (1971: 111) asserts this when he says, ‘it is as idle to imagine that in Plato we can find a precursor to Kant ... as it is to undertake the task of erecting a philosophy on Aristotle’. The basic charge of relativism is familiar enough, and it is fair to say that to embrace it in full would seem to represent a threat to any attempt at scholarship.