By Anna Grear (auth.)
Read Online or Download Redirecting Human Rights: Facing the Challenge of Corporate Legal Humanity PDF
Similar business ethics books
The final touch of the human genome undertaking in 2000 dramatically emphasised the approaching luck of the genetic revolution. the moral and social outcomes of this clinical improvement are big. From human copy to life-extending remedies, from the effect on gender and race to public future health and public safeguard, there's scarcely part of our lives left unaffected through the effect of the hot genetics.
Embedding CSR into company tradition demonstrates new frontier for company social accountability is feasible in conception and perform. the major suggestion - discovery management - allows company managers to deal successfully with difficulties, concerns, and cost clashes taking place on the corporation-society interface.
This publication highlights the main serious points of range and their implications for company Social accountability (CSR), interpreting them in a suite of conceptual and functional contributions from researchers and practitioners alike. particularly the booklet discusses stable and most sensible practices for variety administration and analyzes attainable hyperlinks among CSR and variety inside enterprises.
- Community, Business, Ethics, and Global Capitalism
- Finding Meaning in Business: Theology, Ethics, and Vocation
- A Field Guide to Good Decisions: Values in Action
Extra info for Redirecting Human Rights: Facing the Challenge of Corporate Legal Humanity
The fact that he has to insist that fundamental freedoms lack the intimate bond with human beings that the term ‘human rights’ invokes suggests that he concedes something central to the conceptual critique: the notion that human rights and the human being share, conceptually and linguistically, such a close bond that the notion of ‘corporate’ human rights indeed seems oxymoronic. The conceptual critique of corporate human rights is not defeated by arguing that ‘human rights’ for corporations must, in the ECHR context, be translated as ‘fundamental freedoms’ for corporations.
The conceptual critique of corporate human rights is not defeated by arguing that ‘human rights’ for corporations must, in the ECHR context, be translated as ‘fundamental freedoms’ for corporations. In fact, by relying on the utilisation of a sister concept that diminishes, at least linguistically, the bond between humanity and human rights, Emberland concedes, to a degree, the force of the conceptual critique. Secondly, although Emberland’s criticism works better if understood as an insistence that corporations do not in fact have human rights under the ECHR, but instead enjoy fundamental freedoms, it is by no means clear that any such distinction can easily be drawn.
81 But while the Norms announce a zero-tolerance approach to the most blatant human rights abuses, and for the ﬁrst time, attempt to impose the disciplinary regimes of international human rights law upon business enterprises, the likely future success of the Norms should not be overestimated. 83 The Norms were put on hold at that stage by the Commission, which later (in 2005) recommended that the UN Secretary-General appoint a Special Representative to review the whole question of corporations and human rights.