By Robin A. H. Waterfield

"Is there a person on the earth who's so narrow-minded or uninquisitive that he may possibly fail to wish to grasp how and because of what sort of political method nearly the complete recognized global was once conquered and taken lower than a unmarried empire in below fifty-three years?" -- Polybius, Histories

The 53-year interval Polybius had in brain stretched from the beginning of the second one Punic warfare in 219 BCE till 167, while Rome overthrew the Macedonian monarchy and divided the rustic into 4 self sustaining republics. This was once the an important half-century of Rome's amazing upward push to imperial prestige, yet Roman curiosity in its japanese pals begun a bit prior, with the 1st Illyrian battle of 229, and climaxed later with the notorious destruction of Corinth in 146.

Taken on the Flood chronicles this momentous stream by means of Rome into the Greek east. before, this era of heritage has been overshadowed through the specter of Carthage within the west, yet occasions within the east have been no less significant in themselves, and Robin Waterfield's account finds the extraordinary nature of Rome's japanese coverage. For over seventy years, the Romans shunned annexation so they may possibly dedicate their army and monetary assets to the struggle opposed to Carthage and in other places. even though eventually a failure, this coverage of oblique rule, punctuated by way of periodic brutal army interventions and severe international relations, labored good for numerous a long time, till the Senate ultimately settled on extra direct sorts of regulate.

Waterfield's fast paced narrative focuses ordinarily on army and diplomatic maneuvers, yet all through he interweaves different themes and issues, equivalent to the impression of Greek tradition on Rome, the Roman aristocratic ethos, and the conflict among the 2 top battling machines the traditional international ever produced: the Macedonian phalanx and Roman legion. the result's an soaking up account of a serious bankruptcy in Rome's mastery of the Mediterranean.

Show description

Read or Download Taken at the Flood: The Roman Conquest of Greece (Ancient Warfare and Civilization) PDF

Best greece books

The Socratic Paradoxes and the Greek Mind

In assessing what the paradoxes intended to Plato, O'Brien makes use of definite wide ideas of inquiry. First, he insists, any platonic doctrine needs to be put within the context of Plato's complete philosophy--a truism now not continually venerated. moment, the conversations of the discussion shape don't in basic terms enhance Plato's philosophical statements yet significantly impact their expression.

Alexander the Great and the Mystery of the Elephant Medallions

To all those that witnessed his striking conquests, from Albania to India, Alexander the good seemed invincible. How Alexander himself promoted this appearance--how he abetted the idea that he loved divine desire and commanded even the forces of nature opposed to his enemies--is the topic of Frank L.

Stones of Athens

Reading the monuments of Athens in mild of literature, R. E. Wycherley brings ahead of us town the ancients knew. Philosophers, statesmen, tourists, dramatists, poets, inner most citizens--the phrases of these kind of recommend how town checked out a variety of classes, how its monuments got here to be outfitted, and the way they served the folks in way of life.

Plato's Reception of Parmenides

John Palmer offers a brand new and unique account of Plato's makes use of and knowing of his most crucial Presocratic predecessor, Parmenides. Adopting an leading edge method of the appraisal of highbrow impact, Palmer first explores the Eleatic underpinnings of vital parts in Plato's middle-period epistemology and metaphysics after which exhibits how within the later dialogues Plato confronts a number of sophistic appropriations of Parmenides.

Extra info for Taken at the Flood: The Roman Conquest of Greece (Ancient Warfare and Civilization)

Example text

1 Phoenice. The capture by King Agron of this strategic northern Epirote city in 230 bce gave the Illyrians the confidence that made them a threat to the region—and so brought them into collision with Rome. Agron died a short while later, reputedly from pleurisy contracted after the over-enthusiastic celebration of his victories. 3 Teuta inherited a critical situation. Following the loss of Phoenice, the Epirotes had joined the Aetolian–Achaean alliance, and their new allies dispatched an army north as soon as they could.

Each officer had different responsibilities: if it was a matter of food supply to the city of Rome, the Senate would turn to an aedile; if it was a matter of making war, it would turn to a consul. Rome was governed, then, by an elite, with a relatively small number of families repeatedly holding a proportionately large number of senior offices. They even kept all the most important priesthoods to themselves, to prevent the emergence of a powerful priestly estate. They fought together, dined together, shared cultural interests, intermarried, adopted one another’s sons, and loaned one another money.

This is not to say that Rome was the aggressor in every war it fought, but the facts remain: Rome was almost continuously at war in the early and middle Republic (500–150 bce, in round numbers), every opportunity for war that the Senate offered was accepted by the people of Rome, and the benefits were recognized by all. The report the Coruncanii, or the survivors of their mission, brought back to Rome fell on receptive ears. There can be little doubt that there were voices in the Senate pushing for eastern expansion too.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.20 of 5 – based on 32 votes